Back to Strategic ImpactHydrogen Systems:

Case Study · Should Costing + Carbon
Hydrogen Systems:
Dryer Vessel Impact.
How a dual cost + carbon model exposed a 32% pricing gap and 825 kgCO₂e of avoidable emissions per vessel across a green hydrogen OEM supply chain.
32%
Cost Gap Closed
$4,650
Savings Per Vessel
50%
Carbon Reduction
8.25t
Annual tCO₂e Avoided
Executive Situation
Client manufacturing 10 MW PEM electrolyser hydrogen plants.
Twin-tower desiccant dryer vessels sourced from high-cost EU supplier.
Sustainability mandate required tracking Scope 3 carbon.
First-principles validation of unit economics required.
The Mandate
Build bottom-up should-cost model (BoM, labour, inspection).
Layer Scope 3 carbon calculation (Materials, energy, freight).
Compare European vs. Asia-Pacific fabrication routes.
Execute fact-based supplier negotiation.
Dual-Lens Performance
| Comp | Current | Optimised |
|---|---|---|
| Shell | SS 316L | CS + Lining |
| Desiccant | Mol sieve | Silica Gel |
| Freight | EU Road | Asia Sea |
Carbon Reduction Path
SS 316L shell plate952 kg
Fabrication energy320 kg
Mol sieve desiccant210 kg